How is a Summary Different from a Book Review? [2023]

Weathered books

Are you puzzled over the difference between a book summary and a book review? As book lovers and experts in book summaries and book reviews, our team is here to help. In this article, we'll explain the primary differences between these two literary forms. We'll also cover their similarities, how they differ from a literature review, and more.

Book Summary vs Book Review: Key Differences

Spent a week in Los Angeles with my friends and decided to visit the Last Bookstore as one of our stops. I came up with the idea of floating the book with help of my friend. I took two shots one without the book and one with the book being held up from my friend. Photoshopped his arm out of the shot later in post and this was the outcome.

A book summary provides a condensed version of a book’s content and main ideas, while a book review typically provides an evaluation of a book's merits, demerits, and usefulness. When writing a summary, you are expected to provide a brief of the book's plot, main characters, and major events in your words. In contrast, a review is a critical analysis of a book that includes your thoughts, point of view, and opinion about the book and its contents.

One of the most significant differences between the two is their purpose. The purpose of a summary is to provide an overview of a book's content, while the purpose of a review is to assess, evaluate, criticize and offer feedback on a book's content, style, and quality.

Moreover, summaries tend to be brief and factual, while reviews are lengthier, often between 500 and 1000 words, and more analytical. A summary is an excellent choice for someone who wants the gist of what a book is about without dedicating all the time it would take to read it. A review is suitable for someone who has finished reading a book and wants to talk about impressions, thoughts, and critiques of the book.

Similarities between Book Summary and Review

Both a book summary and review require reading the book. Also, both provide valuable information to readers trying to decide whether or not to read a book. Summaries, however, provide more objective information, whereas reviews offer more subjective evaluations.

In many cases, reviews and summaries can be written by people who haven’t read the book. In such cases, a rewriting or summarizing service is used which provides with detailed summaries and reviews.

What are the Differences between a Book Summary and Full Book?

A book summary is a shorter version of a book, often one to five pages in length, that summarizes the central idea, main characters, and narrative style. In contrast, a full book includes all the content of a book, including characters' details, plots, dialogue, themes, and setting. A summary tends to focus solely on the crucial elements, which could make it easier to understand the book.

The author of the summary usually omits any additional backstory or character development that could be either redundant or not necessary for the purpose of the summary. In contrast, the full book provides a wealth of information that could have been omitted or compressed in the summary.

The bottom line is a summary is helpful for someone who wants to familiarize themselves briefly with a book and its crucial elements, and a full book is meant for an in-depth reading experience.

Book Review vs Literature Review

Leather bound books

A book review is a critical assessment of a book that focuses on its strengths and weaknesses. It evaluates the book as a whole, the literary elements (e.g., characters, plot, setting), and the author's achievement. On the other hand, a literature review examines and critiques the literature in a specific field or topic area. Literature reviews summarize and synthesize the ideas and opinions of a broader array of literature sources.

Book reviews and literature reviews aim for a similar objective, assessing texts, but each has a different scope. Literature reviews require prior research, and their focus is to identify gaps in the literature and to review scholarly publications.

FAQ

What are the similarities between book review and summary?

Book reviews and summaries are similar in the sense that they are both types of book reports or critiques. They are both meant to express an opinion or a thought about the book, its characters, plot, and style. Although summaries focus mainly on objective information, and reviews have more of a subjective or evaluative tone, both seek to provide valuable information.

What is the difference between a book summary and a full book?

A book summary is a brief overview of a book that typically ranges in length from one to five pages, while a full book is the actual complete book. A summary seeks to highlight the essential points of a book, primarily meant for someone who wants to know the most critical information about a book quickly, while a full book is meant for in-depth reading enjoyment.

What is the difference between a book review and a literature review?

A book review evaluates specific works while a literature review evaluates a body of work on a topic. Literature reviews could be called systematic and comprehensive searches of scholarly literature relevant to a particular question. This search is then followed by evaluative judgments of the quality of the literature sources.

Quick Tips and Facts

  • Book summaries are perfect for people looking to get a quick understanding of a book's main ideas.
  • Book reviews are ideal for those who want an in-depth critique of a book's literary elements and style.
  • Literature reviews are best for people who want to learn about a research topic and the scholarly literature on the subject.
  • Summaries are typically one to five pages long, while book reviews are usually between 500-1000 words.
  • Consider reading summaries first before committing to the entire book to determine if the book is relevant to your interests.
  • Good summaries should be written in concise language and focus on important ideas.
  • In contrast, good reviews should analyze and evaluate the book, providing context for the book's content.

So, in conclusion, while book summaries and reviews seem similar, they have different purposes, lengths, and levels of detail. If you're interested in learning what a book is about, opt for a summary. However, if you're interested in evaluating its literary value and your thoughts about the book, choose a review. And, if you're reviewing academic literature, a literature review is essential.

Regardless of which you choose, book summaries, reviews, and literature reviews are invaluable for accessing and evaluating information and help make informed decisions.

Links:

Sources:

Review Team
Review Team
Articles: 149

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *